The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1678-1686 November 21, 2002 Number 21
NextNext

Specialty of Ambulatory Care Physicians and Mortality among Elderly Patients after Myocardial Infarction
John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., Mary Beth Landrum, Ph.D., Edward Guadagnoli, Ph.D., and Peter Gaccione, M.A.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Lurie, N.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The outcome after myocardial infarction may be influenced by the type of physician providing ambulatory care.

Methods We studied 35,520 patients 65 years of age or older who were hospitalized for myocardial infarction in seven states during 1994 and 1995 and who survived for at least three months after discharge. From Medicare claims, we identified ambulatory visits to cardiologists, internists, and family practitioners. Using propensity scores to adjust for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics, we analyzed treatment and mortality at two years among patients matched according to their estimated propensity to receive care from a cardiologist within three months after discharge.

Results As compared with patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner in the three months after discharge, patients who saw a cardiologist were younger, were more likely to be white, were more likely to be male, had fewer coexisting conditions, and were more likely to have undergone invasive cardiac procedures while hospitalized (P<0.01 for all comparisons). Patients who saw a cardiologist were more likely to undergo cardiac procedures and rehabilitation after discharge. Patients who saw a cardiologist had a lower two-year mortality rate than matched patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner (14.6 percent vs. 18.3 percent, P<0.001). Patients who saw both a cardiologist and an internist or a family practitioner had a lower mortality rate than matched patients who saw only a cardiologist (11.1 percent vs. 12.1 percent, P=0.02).

Conclusions Ambulatory visits to cardiologists were associated with greater use of cardiac procedures and decreased mortality after myocardial infarction. Concurrent care by an internist or a family practitioner was associated with a further reduction in mortality.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (J.Z.A.); and the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (J.Z.A., M.B.L., E.G., P.G.) — all in Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Ayanian at the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, or at ayanian{at}hcp.med.harvard.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Specialty of Ambulatory Care Physicians and Mortality after Myocardial Infarction
James P. A., Hartz A. J., Levy B. T., Ayanian J. Z., Landrum M. B., Gaccione P.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1288-1289, Mar 27, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.