The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 361:1807-1808 October 29, 2009 Number 18
NextNext

Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Dondorp, A. M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Dondorp et al. (July 30 issue)1 describe artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum, based on a prolonged parasite clearance time, in Pailin, western Cambodia, as compared with Wang Pha, on the Thai–Burmese border. Paradoxically, post-treatment recurrent parasitemia occurred less frequently in Pailin than in Wang Pha. The authors assert that 12 of the 15 recurrent infections in Wang Pha were new infections and not the result of drug failure.

This reinfection rate among the 40 patients enrolled (30%) greatly exceeds both the rate reported previously by the authors' research unit2 and the area's attack rate of one case per person per year.3 Furthermore, the polymerase-chain-reaction assay protocol used to diagnose recurrences commonly misidentifies drug failures as new infections in Thailand and Cambodia.4 Thus, many of the "new infections" on the Thai–Burmese border may actually be recrudescent infections; the true failure rates in Pailin and Wang Pha could be as high as 20.0% and 37.5%, respectively. These data — in conjunction with the absence of an increased 50% inhibitory concentration in vitro, molecular evidence of resistance, or a clear association between the parasite clearance time and clinical response — suggest that clinically relevant artemisinin resistance has not emerged in Pailin.


Steve M. Taylor, M.D., M.P.H.
Duke University
Durham, NC
steve.taylor{at}duke.edu


Jonathan J. Juliano, M.D., M.S.P.H.
Steven R. Meshnick, M.D., Ph.D.
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

References

  1. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 2009;361:455-467. [Free Full Text]
  2. Carrara VI, Zwang J, Ashley EA, et al. Changes in the treatment responses to artesunate-mefloquine on the northwestern border of Thailand during 13 years of continuous deployment. PLoS One 2009;4(2):e4551.
  3. Luxemburger C, Thwai KL, White NJ, et al. The epidemiology of malaria in a Karen population on the western border of Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996;90:105-111. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Juliano JJ, Ariey F, Sem R, et al. Misclassification of drug failure in Plasmodium falciparum clinical trials in southeast Asia. J Infect Dis 2009;200:624-628. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

 
To the Editor: In the study reported on by Dondorp et al., the two study groups have significant differences in parasite density at baseline. Parasite density has a strong effect on treatment response and outcome that statistical adjustment may not properly account for. Clinically, patients with a high parasite count will have more severe illness, a delayed response to therapy, and a greater chance of the detection of parasites after treatment. Moreover, a slight difference in the peripheral-blood parasite count may mean a great difference in the parasite biomass (i.e., the number of parasites sequestered in vital organs, which may be 40 times as high as the number of the peripheral parasite count).1,2 Significant differences in other baseline variables such as temperature and levels of plasma glucose, creatinine, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase make the two populations different clinically. Since 20 patients recruited in Wang Pha did not have fever at admission, these patients may have had partial immunity to malaria (premunition); this may have affected the treatment response. The results reported are excellent, with fever clearance at day 2 and parasite clearance at day 2 to day 3. Is drug resistance really a problem?


Zaw Win Htut, M.B., B.S., M.Med.Sc.
Mandalay General Hospital
Mandalay, Myanmar
drzawwinhtut{at}gmail.com

References

  1. Newton CR, Hien TT, White N. Cerebral malaria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:433-441. [Free Full Text]
  2. Silamut K, Phu NH, Whitty C, et al. A quantitative analysis of the microvascular sequestration of malaria parasites in the human brain. Am J Pathol 1999;155:395-410. [Free Full Text]

 
The authors reply: Taylor et al. and Htut question whether our data provide support for the conclusion that artemisinin-resistant falciparum malaria has emerged in western Cambodia, yet none of the correspondents dispute the key findings of markedly delayed parasite clearance times with sufficient drug concentrations. Taylor et al. have promoted their alternative to the methods of parasite genotyping recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and used in our study.1 On the basis of the use of these genotyping methods recommended by the WHO in a small number of patients hospitalized outside the area of Thailand where malaria is endemic, they suggest that we have significantly misattributed recrudescences as reinfections. We do not find their estimates of misattribution convincing, and we think it is unlikely that the methods of parasite genotyping recommended by the WHO are seriously flawed. Furthermore, even if recrudescences in Thailand were underestimated, we do not see how this challenges the main findings of our study. High reinfection rates in Wang Pha are probably explained by the recruitment of patients from Myanmar (formerly known as Burma), because the transmission of malaria is higher there than in the refugee camps on the Thai side, where the data mentioned by Taylor et al. were collected. The lack of in vitro correlates of resistance is probably explained by the fact that current in vitro susceptibility techniques will not detect a stage-specific loss of ring-stage susceptibility.

We also do not agree with Htut that faster parasite clearance times on the Thai–Burmese border are caused by acquired host immunity, since in our article we described no effect of age on parasite clearance times in a large data set from the same region. We do agree that the difference in the levels of parasitemia on admission is a confounder in the comparison of parasite clearance times between sites. However, stratification according to the levels of parasitemia on admission and comparison of clearance rates rather than times, which are much less dependent on levels of parasitemia at admission, still showed a large and highly significant difference between the two regions. We are forced reluctantly to conclude that artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum is now established in western Cambodia.


Arjen M. Dondorp, M.D.
François Nosten, M.D.
Nicholas J. White, F.R.S.
Oxford University
Oxford, United Kingdom
arjen{at}tropmedres.ac

References

  1. Genotyping to identify parasite populations. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Dondorp, A. M.
-PubMed Citation


HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.