The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Clinical Implications of Basic Research
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:933-934 March 3, 2005 Number 9
NextNext

Toward a New Therapy for Tuberculosis
Eric J. Rubin, M.D., Ph.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
It is often tempting to abandon old ways for glamorous new ones. Such is certainly the case for antibiotic development. However, a recent study by Andries and colleagues1 shows that established methods, enhanced by modern techniques, can be used to generate exciting results.

Traditionally, we have identified antibiotics by looking for compounds that block microbial growth. Since many pathogens can easily be cultured, it is a straightforward matter to screen large numbers of compounds in order to identify any that inhibit the growth of these pathogens. This strategy has several advantages. First, there is no need to guess which microbial . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.